Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600X is 1963 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 91% cheaper than Ryzen 5 2600X - €20.16 vs €225.71
- Up to 90% better value when playing Valheim than Ryzen 5 2600X - €0.11 vs €1.14 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2600X - 55 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
- Performs up to 5% better in Valheim than Celeron G1620 - 198 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 12 vs 2 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
189
95%
Value, €/FPS
€0.11/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €20.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 55 minutes ago
Buy for €225.71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 56 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600X |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |