Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4790 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-4790 is 514 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i7-4790 - €20.16 vs €157.65
- Up to 87% better value when playing Minecraft than Core i7-4790 - €0.03 vs €0.23 per FPS
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Core i7-4790 - 55 vs 84 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4790
- Performs up to 15% better in Minecraft than Celeron G1620 - 685 vs 596 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 8 vs 2 threads
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
596
87%
Value, €/FPS
€0.03/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €20.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7 minutes ago
Buy for €157.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Core i7-4790 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 84 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |