Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2400G outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 2400G is 1897 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2400G - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
- Performs up to 12% better in Minecraft than Celeron G1620 - 668 vs 596 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 8 vs 2 threads
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €74.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 338 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
38.69441816461684%
Multi-Core
723
21.948998178506375%
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2400G |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raven Ridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |