Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 3319 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 8% better in Baldur's Gate 3 than Celeron G1620 - 118 vs 109 FPS
Baldur's Gate 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €69.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
25.514660012476607%
Multi-Core
723
26.817507418397625%
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
No | Overclockable | No |