Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 5 3600 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 912 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen 5 3600.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 1% better in War Thunder than Ryzen 5 3600 - 192 vs 191 FPS
- Up to 22% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3600 - €69.58 vs €89.42
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 12 vs 2 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Buy for €69.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 228 minutes ago
Buy for €89.42 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 229 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |