Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 618 days older than the cheaper Core i3-10105F.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600
- Performs up to 3% better in Battlefield V than Core i3-10105F - 248 vs 240 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Up to 9% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3600 - €74.28 vs €81.96
- Up to 6% better value when playing Battlefield V than Ryzen 5 3600 - €0.31 vs €0.33 per FPS
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €81.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12949 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
240
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€74.28
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €74.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12948 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Matisse | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |