Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms Ryzen 3 3100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 620 days newer than Ryzen 3 3100.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 2% better in Valorant than Ryzen 3 3100 - 798 vs 784 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3100
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
784
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.12/FPS
100%
Price, €
€96.42
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €96.42 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 141 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3100 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |