Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms the cheaper Pentium G4560 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G4560 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 1827 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G4560.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 14% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Pentium G4560 - 179 vs 157 FPS
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4560
- Up to 17% cheaper than Celeron G6900 - €55.45 vs €66.9
- Up to 5% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Celeron G6900 - €0.35 vs €0.37 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
179
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.37/FPS
94.5945945945946%
Price, €
€66.9
82%
FPS Winner
Buy for €66.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 48114 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
157
87.70949720670392%
Value, €/FPS
€0.35/FPS
100%
Price, €
€55.45
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €55.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 48114 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
707
44.10480349344978%
Multi-Core
1452
53.85756676557863%
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | Intel Pentium G4560 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Pentium |
Alder Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | 54 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |