Key Differences
In short — Pentium Gold G7400 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Pentium Gold G7400 is 3319 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 79% cheaper than Pentium Gold G7400 - €20.16 vs €97.9
- Up to 76% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Pentium Gold G7400 - €0.12 vs €0.49 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Pentium Gold G7400
- Performs up to 20% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Celeron G1620 - 201 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 4 vs 2 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
167
83%
Value, €/FPS
€0.12/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €20.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
201
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.49/FPS
24%
Price, €
€97.9
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for €97.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 25 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Pentium Gold G7400 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Pentium Gold |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
No | Overclockable | No |