Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 4600G outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 4600G is 2787 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 4600G - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 4600G
- Performs up to 90% better in FIFA 23 than Celeron G1620 - 173 vs 91 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 12 vs 2 threads
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Ryzen 5 4600G
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
25.984752223634054%
Multi-Core
723
11.800228496817365%
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 4600G |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2020 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Not Available |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 2 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 7 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
