Key Differences
In short — Core i3-2120 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-2120 is 652 days older than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 68% cheaper than Core i3-2120 - €20.16 vs €62.99
- Up to 67% better value when playing World of Tanks than Core i3-2120 - €0.04 vs €0.12 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i3-2120 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2120
- Performs up to 1% better in World of Tanks than Celeron G1620 - 506 vs 503 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 4 vs 2 threads
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
503
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.04/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €20.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 54 minutes ago
Buy for €62.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 54 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Core i3-2120 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Feb 20th, 2011 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
No | Overclockable | No |