Key Differences
In short — Pentium Gold G6400 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Pentium Gold G6400 is 2705 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 76% cheaper than Pentium Gold G6400 - €20.16 vs €82.38
- Up to 76% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Pentium Gold G6400 - €0.12 vs €0.49 per FPS
- Consumes up to 5% less energy than Intel Pentium Gold G6400 - 55 vs 58 Watts
Advantages of Intel Pentium Gold G6400
- Performs up to 2% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Celeron G1620 - 169 vs 166 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 4 vs 2 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
166
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.12/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €20.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 33 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
169
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.49/FPS
24%
Price, €
€82.38
24%
FPS Winner
Buy for €82.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 33 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Pentium Gold G6400 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Pentium Gold |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 58 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |