Key Differences
In short — Pentium Gold G5400 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Pentium Gold G5400 is 1946 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 83% cheaper than Pentium Gold G5400 - €20.16 vs €122.0
- Up to 83% better value when playing Rocket League than Pentium Gold G5400 - €0.03 vs €0.18 per FPS
- Consumes up to 5% less energy than Intel Pentium Gold G5400 - 55 vs 58 Watts
Advantages of Intel Pentium Gold G5400
- Performs up to 2% better in Rocket League than Celeron G1620 - 685 vs 671 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 4 vs 2 threads
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
671
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.03/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €20.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 72 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
FPS
685
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.18/FPS
16%
Price, €
€122
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for €122 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Pentium Gold G5400 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 2nd, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Pentium Gold |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 58 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |