Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7100 outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-7100 is 1492 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100
- Performs up to 11% better in Battlefield IV than Celeron G1620 - 407 vs 368 FPS
- Consumes up to 7% less energy than Intel Celeron G1620 - 51 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 4 vs 2 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €145.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76007 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
32.79871692060946%
Multi-Core
723
29.631147540983605%
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Core i3-7100 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 51 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |