Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4670T outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-4670T is 181 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 93% cheaper than Core i5-4670T - €20.16 vs €288.0
- Up to 83% better value when playing League of Legends than Core i5-4670T - €0.43 vs €2.55 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670T
- Performs up to 140% better in League of Legends than Celeron G1620 - 113 vs 47 FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Celeron G1620 - 45 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 4 vs 2 threads
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
47
41%
Value, €/FPS
€0.43/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €20.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13347 minutes ago
Buy for €288 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13348 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Core i5-4670T |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 45 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |