Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-8700 outperforms the more expensive Core i5-4670T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-8700 is 1674 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-4670T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670T
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i7-8700 - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-8700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700
- Performs up to 13% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-4670T - 572 vs 507 FPS
- Up to 19% cheaper than Core i5-4670T - €233.48 vs €288.0
- Up to 28% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-4670T - €0.41 vs €0.57 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670T - 12 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €288 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16798 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2018
FPS
572
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.41/FPS
100%
Price, €
€233.48
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €233.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16798 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4670T | vs | Intel Core i7-8700 |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 1st, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |