Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-9900K outperforms the more expensive Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-9900K is 2146 days newer than the more expensive Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900K - 55 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 2% better in Control than Celeron G1620 - 203 vs 199 FPS
- Up to 37% cheaper than Celeron G1620 - €12.76 vs €20.16
- Up to 40% better value when playing Control than Celeron G1620 - €0.06 vs €0.1 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 16 vs 2 threads
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €20.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18415 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
203
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.06/FPS
100%
Price, €
€12.76
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €12.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18415 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900K |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |