Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6850K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6850K is 1275 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i7-6850K - €20.16 vs €164.94
- Up to 88% better value when playing God of War than Core i7-6850K - €0.12 vs €0.96 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i7-6850K - 55 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6850K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6850K
- Performs up to 6% better in God of War than Celeron G1620 - 172 vs 162 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 12 vs 2 threads
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
162
94%
Value, €/FPS
€0.12/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €20.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76 minutes ago
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
172
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.96/FPS
12%
Price, €
€164.94
12%
FPS Winner
Buy for €164.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Core i7-6850K |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Broadwell E |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 140 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |