Buy on Amazon
€20.16
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $109
Availability
MSRP in USD: $109
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-14100F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-14100F is 4053 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i3-14100F - €20.16 vs €141.98
- Up to 81% better value when playing Lost Ark than Core i3-14100F - €0.09 vs €0.48 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-14100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-14100F
- Performs up to 34% better in Lost Ark than Celeron G1620 - 296 vs 221 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 8 vs 2 threads
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
221
74%
Value, €/FPS
€0.09/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.16
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G1620 CPU Verwendeter 2-Kern-2-Thread-Desktop-Prozessor 2,7 GHz 2M 55W LGA1155
Buy for €20.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 174 minutes ago
Core i3-14100F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
296
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.48/FPS
18%
Price, €
€141.98
14%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i3-14100F Desktop-Prozessor 4 Kerne (4 P-Kerne + 0 E-Kerne) bis zu 4,7 GHz
Buy for €141.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 174 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Core i3-14100F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Core i3-14100F |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
| 55 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
