Buy on Amazon
CA$182.45
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $199
Availability
MSRP in USD: $199
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $799
Availability
MSRP in USD: $799
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms the cheaper FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 1752 days newer than the cheaper FX-8350.
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Up to 52% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - CA$182.45 vs CA$382.26
- Up to 46% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - CA$1.69 vs CA$3.11 per FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 125 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 14% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than FX-8350 - 123 vs 108 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 24 vs 8 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
FX-8350
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
108
87%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.69/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$182.45
100%
Value Winner
AMD FX-Series FX-8350 CPU Used 8-Core 8-Thread Desktop Processor 4 GHz 8M 125W Socket AM3+
Buy for CA$182.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 151 minutes ago
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
123
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.11/FPS
54%
Price, CA$
CA$382.26
47%
FPS Winner
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X (12-core/24-thread) Desktop Processor (YD192XA8AEWOF)
Buy for CA$382.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 152 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
FX-8350
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8350 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
| FX | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Vishera | Codename | Whitehaven |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 12 |
| 8 | Threads | 24 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
