Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 1547 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Up to 14% cheaper than Core i9-12900KF - CA$375.0 vs CA$434.33
- Up to 7% better value when playing Fortnite than Core i9-12900KF - CA$1.68 vs CA$1.8 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 8% better in Fortnite than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 241 vs 223 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 125 vs 180 Watts
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
223
92%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.68/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$375
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$375 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13358 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
241
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.8/FPS
93%
Price, CA$
CA$434.33
86%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$434.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13357 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | vs | Intel Core i9-12900KF |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 16 |
24 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |