Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700 is 994 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Up to 19% cheaper than Core i7-10700 - CA$380.18 vs CA$468.62
- Up to 7% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i7-10700 - CA$2.29 vs CA$2.47 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10700 - 24 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700
- Performs up to 14% better in War Thunder than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 190 vs 166 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
166
87%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.29/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$380.18
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$380.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 197 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
190
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.47/FPS
92%
Price, CA$
CA$468.62
81%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$468.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 196 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | vs | Intel Core i7-10700 |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |