Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-10700F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-10700F is 994 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10700F - 24 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 8% better in New World than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 119 vs 110 FPS
- Up to 7% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - CA$349.79 vs CA$375.0
- Up to 14% better value when playing New World than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - CA$2.94 vs CA$3.41 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
110
92%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.41/FPS
86%
Price, CA$
CA$375
93%
Buy for CA$375 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13620 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
119
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.94/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$349.79
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$349.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13620 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |