Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i7-10700F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-10700F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900KF is 478 days older than the cheaper Core i7-10700F.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Up to 23% cheaper than Core i9-9900KF - CA$357.87 vs CA$465.0
- Up to 22% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i9-9900KF - CA$2.89 vs CA$3.72 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900KF - 65 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KF
- Performs up to 1% better in Elden Ring than Core i7-10700F - 125 vs 124 FPS
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
124
99%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.89/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$357.87
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$357.87 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
125
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.72/FPS
77%
Price, CA$
CA$465
76%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$465 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700F | vs | Intel Core i9-9900KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |