Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13500 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-10700F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-10700F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13500 is 979 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-10700F.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Up to 29% cheaper than Core i5-13500 - CA$349.79 vs CA$490.08
- Up to 14% better value when playing Starfield than Core i5-13500 - CA$5.64 vs CA$6.53 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13500
- Performs up to 21% better in Starfield than Core i7-10700F - 75 vs 62 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10700F - 20 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
62
82%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$5.64/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$349.79
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$349.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15344 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
75
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$6.53/FPS
86%
Price, CA$
CA$490.08
71%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$490.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15344 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700F | vs | Intel Core i5-13500 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 14 |
16 | Threads | 20 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |