Buy on Amazon
CA$465
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $488
Availability
MSRP in USD: $488
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i7-10700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-10700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900KF is 478 days older than the cheaper Core i7-10700.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KF
- Performs up to 2% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-10700 - 112 vs 110 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700
- Up to 17% cheaper than Core i9-9900KF - CA$383.99 vs CA$465.0
- Up to 16% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i9-9900KF - CA$3.49 vs CA$4.15 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900KF - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-9900KF
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
112
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.15/FPS
84%
Price, CA$
CA$465
82%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i9-9900KF Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 5.0 GHz Turbo Unlocked Without Processor Graphics LGA1151 300 Series 95W
Buy for CA$465 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13253 minutes ago
Core i7-10700
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
110
98%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.49/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$383.99
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i7-10700 Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 4.8 GHz LGA 1200 (Intel 400 Series Chipset) 65W, BX8070110700
Buy for CA$383.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13253 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-9900KF
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Core i7-10700
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900KF | vs | Intel Core i7-10700 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 8 |
| 16 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
