Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-14400F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-14400F is 2342 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-14400F - 24 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400F
- Performs up to 8% better in The Last of Us Part I than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 144 vs 133 FPS
- Up to 13% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - CA$324.72 vs CA$375.0
- Up to 20% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - CA$2.26 vs CA$2.82 per FPS
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
133
92%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.82/FPS
80%
Price, CA$
CA$375
86%
Buy for CA$375 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13376 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
144
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.26/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$324.72
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$324.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13375 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | vs | Intel Core i5-14400F |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 10 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
180 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |