Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 994 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Up to 9% cheaper than Core i9-10900KF - CA$375.0 vs CA$412.49
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 24 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 15% better in Far Cry 3 than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 155 vs 135 FPS
- Up to 4% better value when playing Far Cry 3 than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - CA$2.66 vs CA$2.78 per FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 125 vs 180 Watts
Far Cry 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
135
87%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.78/FPS
95%
Price, CA$
CA$375
100%
Buy for CA$375 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13764 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
155
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.66/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$412.49
90%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$412.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13763 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | vs | Intel Core i9-10900KF |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 10 |
24 | Threads | 20 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |