Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-8350K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-8350K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 938 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-8350K.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 17% better in Immortals of Aveum than Core i3-8350K - 63 vs 54 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8350K - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8350K
- Up to 23% cheaper than Core i9-10900KF - CA$318.88 vs CA$412.49
- Up to 10% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Core i9-10900KF - CA$5.91 vs CA$6.55 per FPS
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 91 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
63
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$6.55/FPS
90%
Price, CA$
CA$412.49
77%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$412.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13699 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
54
85%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$5.91/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$318.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$318.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13699 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900KF | vs | Intel Core i3-8350K |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 91 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |