Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8350K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 1600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-8350K is 177 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8350K
- Performs up to 10% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Ryzen 5 1600 - 567 vs 517 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Up to 22% cheaper than Core i3-8350K - CA$250.0 vs CA$318.88
- Up to 14% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i3-8350K - CA$0.48 vs CA$0.56 per FPS
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than Intel Core i3-8350K - 65 vs 91 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8350K - 12 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
567
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.56/FPS
85%
Price, CA$
CA$318.88
78%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$318.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17757 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
517
91%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.48/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$250
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$250 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17757 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-8350K | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600 |
---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
91 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |