Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 9 3900X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 298 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen 9 3900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 0% better in F1 22 than Ryzen 9 3900X - 281 vs 280 FPS
- Up to 38% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3900X - CA$394.29 vs CA$635.0
- Up to 38% better value when playing F1 22 than Ryzen 9 3900X - CA$1.4 vs CA$2.27 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 105 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 24 vs 20 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
281
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.4/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$394.29
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$394.29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10 minutes ago
Buy for CA$635 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900KF | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 12 |
20 | Threads | 24 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |