Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 1600X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 1115 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 6% better in Escape From Tarkov than Ryzen 5 1600X - 214 vs 202 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 1600X - 20 vs 12 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
- Up to 70% cheaper than Core i9-10900KF - CA$141.17 vs CA$474.72
- Up to 68% better value when playing Escape From Tarkov than Core i9-10900KF - CA$0.7 vs CA$2.22 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 95 vs 125 Watts
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
214
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.22/FPS
31%
Price, CA$
CA$474.72
29%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$474.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 33 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
202
94%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.7/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$141.17
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$141.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 33 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900KF | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 6 |
20 | Threads | 12 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |