Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 1600X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10105 is 1435 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
- Up to 10% cheaper than Core i3-10105 - CA$141.17 vs CA$156.99
- Up to 9% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i3-10105 - CA$0.52 vs CA$0.57 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105
- Performs up to 3% better in F1 22 than Ryzen 5 1600X - 277 vs 270 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 1600X - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1600X doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
270
97%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.52/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$141.17
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$141.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18215 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
277
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.57/FPS
91%
Price, CA$
CA$156.99
89%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$156.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18214 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X | vs | Intel Core i3-10105 |
---|---|---|
Apr 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |