Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 1600X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3770 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 1600X is 1808 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
- Performs up to 9% better in World of Warcraft than Core i7-3770 - 175 vs 161 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770
- Up to 26% cheaper than Ryzen 5 1600X - CA$104.99 vs CA$141.17
- Up to 20% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Ryzen 5 1600X - CA$0.65 vs CA$0.81 per FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 1600X - 77 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1600X doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
175
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.81/FPS
80%
Price, CA$
CA$141.17
74%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$141.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13375 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
161
92%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.65/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$104.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$104.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13374 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X | vs | Intel Core i7-3770 |
---|---|---|
Apr 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |