Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G6900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 614 days older than the cheaper Celeron G6900.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 1% better in The Outer Worlds than Celeron G6900 - 208 vs 206 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 20 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i9-10900KF - CA$113.5 vs CA$400.0
- Up to 71% better value when playing The Outer Worlds than Core i9-10900KF - CA$0.55 vs CA$1.92 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
The Outer Worlds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
208
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.92/FPS
28%
Price, CA$
CA$400
28%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$400 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 579 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
206
99%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.55/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$113.5
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$113.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 580 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900KF | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
Comet Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |