Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10900F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-10900F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900KF and the cheaper Core i9-10900F have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 0% better in Monster Hunter: World than Core i9-10900F - 261 vs 260 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Up to 6% cheaper than Core i9-10900KF - CA$388.0 vs CA$412.49
- Up to 6% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than Core i9-10900KF - CA$1.49 vs CA$1.58 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
261
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.58/FPS
94%
Price, CA$
CA$412.49
94%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$412.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13407 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
260
99%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.49/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$388
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$388 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13407 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900KF | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 10 |
20 | Threads | 20 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |