Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10900F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-10900F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 553 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-10900F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 6% better in Death Stranding than Core i9-10900F - 243 vs 229 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900F - 24 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Up to 11% cheaper than Core i9-12900KF - CA$388.0 vs CA$434.33
- Up to 6% better value when playing Death Stranding than Core i9-12900KF - CA$1.69 vs CA$1.79 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
243
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.79/FPS
94%
Price, CA$
CA$434.33
89%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$434.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11410 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
229
94%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.69/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$388
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$388 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11410 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-12900KF | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Nov 4th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 10 |
24 | Threads | 20 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |