Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11500 outperforms the cheaper FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11500 is 3066 days newer than the cheaper FX-8350.
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Up to 45% cheaper than Core i5-11500 - CA$182.45 vs CA$334.32
- Up to 39% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i5-11500 - CA$1.44 vs CA$2.37 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11500
- Performs up to 11% better in The Last of Us Part I than FX-8350 - 141 vs 127 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
127
90%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.44/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$182.45
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$182.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10292 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
141
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.37/FPS
60%
Price, CA$
CA$334.32
54%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$334.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10299 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8350 | vs | Intel Core i5-11500 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |