Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700F is 1973 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Up to 23% cheaper than Core i7-13700F - CA$369.9 vs CA$479.97
- Up to 18% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i7-13700F - CA$1.36 vs CA$1.66 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700F
- Performs up to 7% better in F1 22 than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 289 vs 271 FPS
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
271
93%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.36/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$369.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$369.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 104 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
289
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.66/FPS
81%
Price, CA$
CA$479.97
77%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$479.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 103 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | vs | Intel Core i7-13700F |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 16 |
24 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
180 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |