Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Xeon W3520 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 3474 days newer than Xeon W3520.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W3520
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 130 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 11% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Xeon W3520 - 130 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3520 - 24 vs 8 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
130
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.45/FPS
100%
Price, $
$188.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $188.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 89 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 30th, 2009
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3520 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Mar 30th, 2009 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Xeon | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Bloomfield | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 180 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |