Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3770K outperforms Xeon W3520 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-3770K is 1126 days newer than Xeon W3520.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770K
- Performs up to 5% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Xeon W3520 - 157 vs 150 FPS
- Consumes up to 41% less energy than Intel Xeon W3520 - 77 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3520 doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
157
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.11/FPS
100%
Price, $
$175
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $175 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 222 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 30th, 2009
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3520 | vs | Intel Core i7-3770K |
---|---|---|
Mar 30th, 2009 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i7 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 77 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |