Key Differences
In short — Xeon W-2125 outperforms FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon W-2125 is 2010 days newer than FX-6200.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W-2125
- Performs up to 6% better in Baldur's Gate 3 than FX-6200 - 116 vs 109 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 120 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 8 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W-2125 doesn't have integrated graphics
Baldur's Gate 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $42.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Aug 29th, 2017
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W-2125 | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
---|---|---|
Aug 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
Xeon W | Collection | FX |
Skylake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 3 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |