Key Differences
In short — Xeon W-2125 outperforms Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon W-2125 is 813 days older than Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W-2125
- Performs up to 2% better in The Last of Us Part I than Athlon 3000G - 134 vs 131 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than Intel Xeon W-2125 - 35 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W-2125 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon W-2125
Server/Workstation • Aug 29th, 2017
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W-2125 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
| Xeon W | Collection | Athlon |
| Skylake | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 120 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
