Key Differences
In short — Xeon W-2125 outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon W-2125 is 1086 days newer than Xeon E5-2620 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W-2125
- Performs up to 6% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 130 vs 123 FPS
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than Intel Xeon W-2125 - 85 vs 120 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Server/Workstation • Aug 29th, 2017
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W-2125 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 |
---|---|---|
Aug 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Xeon W | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Skylake | Codename | Haswell-E |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 85 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |