Key Differences
In short — Xeon W-2125 outperforms Core i7-4800MQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon W-2125 is 1583 days newer than Core i7-4800MQ.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W-2125
- Performs up to 11% better in F1 23 than Core i7-4800MQ - 214 vs 192 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4800MQ
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Xeon W-2125 - 47 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W-2125 doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Xeon W-2125
Server/Workstation • Aug 29th, 2017
Core i7-4800MQ
Mobile • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W-2125 | vs | Intel Core i7-4800MQ |
|---|---|---|
Aug 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| Xeon W | Collection | Core i7 |
| Skylake | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket G3 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 120 W | TDP | 47 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
