Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Xeon E5-2683 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 1486 days newer than Xeon E5-2683 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2683 v3
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 120 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 5% better in Ready or Not than Xeon E5-2683 v3 - 262 vs 249 FPS
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
262
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.72/FPS
100%
Price, $
$188.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $188.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 94 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2683 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 12 |
28 | Threads | 24 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |