Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13500 outperforms Xeon E5-2683 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13500 is 3040 days newer than Xeon E5-2683 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2683 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13500 - 28 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13500
- Performs up to 29% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Xeon E5-2683 v3 - 150 vs 116 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2683 v3 - 65 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2683 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Xeon E5-2683 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Core i5-13500
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2683 v3 | vs | Intel Core i5-13500 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 14 | Cores | 14 |
28 | Threads | 20 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| 3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
| 120 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
