Key Differences
In short — Core i5-8600 outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1650 v4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-8600 is 604 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1650 v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Up to 42% cheaper than Core i5-8600 - $78.02 vs $135.0
- Up to 42% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i5-8600 - $0.52 vs $0.89 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-8600 - 12 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8600
- Performs up to 1% better in Dead Space than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 152 vs 150 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
150
98%
Value, $/FPS
$0.52/FPS
100%
Price, $
$78.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $78.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2718 minutes ago
Buy for $135 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2717 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Feb 14th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 | vs | Intel Core i5-8600 |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Feb 14th, 2018 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 6 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |