Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7820X outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-7820X is 371 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i7-7820X - $136.62 vs $495.0
- Up to 71% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i7-7820X - $0.48 vs $1.68 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7820X
- Performs up to 2% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 294 vs 287 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 16 vs 8 threads
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
287
97%
Value, $/FPS
$0.48/FPS
100%
Price, $
$136.62
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $136.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 216 minutes ago
Buy for $495 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 216 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | Intel Core i7-7820X |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Jun 26th, 2017 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Skylake-E/EP |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |