Buy on Amazon
$449
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $278
Availability
MSRP in USD: $278
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7820X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-7820X is 1884 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7820X
- Performs up to 8% better in Escape From Tarkov than Core i7-3770 - 208 vs 193 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i7-7820X - $64.78 vs $449.0
- Consumes up to 45% less energy than Intel Core i7-7820X - 77 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-7820X doesn't have integrated graphics
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Core i7 i7-7820X Octa-core 8 Core 3.60 GHz Processor Socket R4 LGA-2066
Buy for $449 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76357 minutes ago
Intel Core i7-3770 Quad-Core Processor 3.4 GHz 4 Core LGA 1155 - BX80637I73770
Buy for $64.78 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76355 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-7820X
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Core i7-3770
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-3770
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Single-Core
671
47.55492558469171%
Multi-Core
2299
29.290355459294176%
Intel Core i7-7820X | vs | Intel Core i7-3770 |
|---|---|---|
Jun 26th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Skylake-E/EP | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 140 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
